Regarding signalling issue

[Krishna Kumar Yadav]

Hi all , i just wanted to ask if there's any change that can be made in the signalling system . Can giving a clearance signal be delayed ? I mean when there's a train ahead of u and we immediately get clearance signal just after the last coach of the train that's ahead crosses the signal post. It just seems unpractical that u just have to move with just a train in sight in front of us? Also , in many parts of our country , still telephone signalling system is followed wherein the station master gives clearance to train behind from a station only when the station master of the next station mentions that the train ahead of it has crossed that station. Can this be adopted in msts too? Thank you

[oper190]

Are you referring to MSTS or Open Rails, as you posted in the OR section but said to fix MSTS. There are no fixes for MSTS besides MSTS Bin which appears to be no longer available.

[slipperman]

Hi oper190,
Apologies, but I MUST correct you!
The final 'Working' version of the MSTS Bin Patch is available from the file library as file ID 86097 (v1.8.052113).
Also available is version 1.7.051922 (file ID 86094).

Cheers,
Ged

[derekmorton]

>Can this be adopted in msts too?

MSTS is not in current development, so no.

[eric]

I agree that the delay before clearing a block is a bit unrealistic, but not sure if that's something you can implement in ORTS without destroying a bunch of activities which have been written with the zero-wait in place.

[oper190]

Apologies, but I MUST correct you!

Thanks, I now stand corrected. - Already had it so never looked for it here.