Why I think derailments should be an option (No Fireworks Please)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • markyisri
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2016
    • 182

    #1

    Why I think derailments should be an option (No Fireworks Please)

    I'm aware this has been discussed before, but many people switch to Open Rails because MSTS no longer functions properly.

    It's not prototypical for a regular train to speed around a curve at 110 MPH and not derail.

    I understand that derailments may be an issue for real-life engineers. However, I think that if it was a checkbox, like MSTS, then people could choose for themselves whether they wanted to see it or not.

    Or, if derailments will not be implemented because of simple reasons, then at least put popups.
  • slipperman
    3500 Post Veteran



    • May 2010
    • 3787
    • Worksop, UK
    • MSOR

    #2
    Hi,
    I think you know what kind of response you'll get!!
    With their limited resources, the Open Rails team have much more important enhancements to make. The best you could hope for is a pop-up, as per your final suggestion.

    The source for OR is freely available, so I suggest you learn to program and then you can add whatever you want. I can tell you one thing - it won't be easy!!

    Cheers,
    Ged

    Comment

    • qballbandit
      6500 Post Veteran

      • Jan 2006
      • 6522
      • Elgin Il., USA.
      • MSOR

      #3
      "but many people switch to Open Rails because MSTS no longer functions properly" User end issues, not the sim itself, of course.
      "It's not prototypical for a regular train to speed around a curve at 110 MPH" Then.....why do it?
      Neil

      Chicago Railroading Fan

      Comment

      • Vince
        6500 Post Veteran

        • Nov 1999
        • 6961
        • Mohave

        #4
        Seconded Ged!
        Yes, if you want derailments, go to school, study programming. Then you can write your own 'crash code'. Problem solved!

        btw, exceeding speed presently has a pop-up of sorts, checkbox selected too!
        Broken coupler or air hose and an exceeding safe speed message.

        regards,
        Last edited by Vince; 08-16-2017, 22:32.
        ............Vince ..............
        ...... Author NECv4 .......
        .... LIRR BUILD PHOTOS ....
        ...... Eschew Obsfucation ......

        On the The Statue of Liberty in New York Harbor there is a Tablet. On it is written:
        "Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
        the wretched refuse of your teeming shore, send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
        I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

        Comment

        • markyisri
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2016
          • 182

          #5
          Originally posted by Vince
          Yes, if you want derailments, go to school, study programming.
          I can already program. I just am not familiar with, nor have the computing power to run VS and build OR.

          Comment

          • eolesen
            9500 Post Veteran and Administrator



            • Dec 2002
            • 9583
            • NS MP245.4 CNO&TP South District
            • English, SQL
            • General

            #6
            The community has spoken, and derailments just aren't a priority when compared to the hundreds of other items in the OR development & suggestion backlog.

            You could build a small program to randomly pop-up the words "Derailment" onto your screen, and have it kill the ORTS executable...

            It's the same general effect and it adds an unpredictability factor like having tornados and earthquakes did in SimCity.
            If you like what you see here at Trainsim.com, be it the discussions and knowledge in the forums, or items available in our library, I hope you'll consider a paid membership to help support keeping the site operating.... Thanks!

            Comment

            Working...