SLI Scenic Route 2.0 for OR

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tie
    Senior Member

    • May 2010
    • 926
    • Saskatchewan, CA

    #1

    SLI Scenic Route 2.0 for OR

    I was thinking of purchasing this route, and perhaps MLT Rogers Pass (though SLI seems easier). But for those who have it already, how does the vegetation stand up in Open Rails? Are there any issues with the textures at all?


    Rory
    Rory
  • Don6218
    1500 Post Veteran
    • Jun 2009
    • 1834
    • Oshawa ON

    #2
    I have both, and the vegetation is no where near what the Russian Veg Pacs offer. As such though it looks OK in OR to my old eyes.

    The Scenic has a lot of areas where vegetation is absent and that is where the scenery drops off in OR, too many square lines.

    Just my opinion.

    Comment

    • geepster775
      2500 Post Veteran


      • Sep 2006
      • 2846
      • .
      • General

      #3
      I wouldn't say its absent, just thin in areas. In other areas, its a jungle with no outside cam view possible except straight down the barrel of the train. Seems to be highest detailed in areas with lower track speeds, probably the only place one can beef things up and still work around old MSTS and its stutter issues.

      It's all kinda relevant to its original release date, too, the later releases were increasingly done better.

      Stock is much better in the SLI route. You can get it for $14 during those 50% off sales like the one that just happened a few days ago, and 14 bucks is worth it just for the bumper crop of high poly stock alone even if you toss the route part. Under those circumstances, who besides members of the International Brotherhood of Cavemen or the Mother Theresa "vow of poverty" fan club wouldn't already have these routes by now?

      Excluding Bala, any other MLT route out there is going to need a head-to-toe total scenery and signal redux to eliminate the olive drab vibe. And I'm sorry, all those Sinclair trees still don't do it for me. Some later MLT routes do seem to have better trackwork, although the Rogers Pass route does "sin" a bit by having some mainline sharp curves crafted out of 10d switch end pieces (which aren't true curves) laid in serial. But then any head-to-toe scenery and signal update kinda provides the opportunity to fix the trackwork blunders like that.

      Both routes scream "2004 track design techniques". SLI's has just been polished a bit, scenery-wise.
      My Open Rails videos https://www.youtube.com/@lakecities3663/videos

      Comment

      • Don6218
        1500 Post Veteran
        • Jun 2009
        • 1834
        • Oshawa ON

        #4
        Scenic / KHP in Open Rails

        Here is a screen shot from last evening on the Kicking Horse Pass with updates. The MLT scenery was good for the day but shows its age.[IMG]KHP 1a by D Leblanc, on Flickr[/IMG]

        Comment

        • tie
          Senior Member

          • May 2010
          • 926
          • Saskatchewan, CA

          #5
          Thanks for the input guys. I think I'll shelf MLT route buying for awhile. No offense to the crew at MLT but I'm not one for stick trees either. SLI engines and rolling stock...I love them
          Last edited by tie; 06-22-2017, 14:43.
          Rory

          Comment

          • CRQ5508
            Senior Member
            • Jul 2006
            • 526
            • N'Hampsha

            #6
            The problem with the Scenic Sub route is that it is so utterly inaccurate to the real thing that I don't find it worth the money. Several towns are missing or done so incorrectly that you can't even tell it's an actual town.
            Thom
            sigpic
            Norfolk Southern: It looks like Darth Vader on rails to me.

            Comment

            Working...