And I will continue to point out that it is rude to criticize what other people choose to do with their free-time, Otto.
X.1744
Collapse
X
-
-
If you are talking to me then which bridge in what route and its activity is there a car flying off a bridge ?
What coupling problem which has been fixed, I am not having one coupling like this:
http://www.otto-wipfel.co.uk/video/orts-coupling.wmv
Comment
-
Well, there's the answer to all your stressing-out, Otto.
"Eventually".
Not because you demanded it.
BKIBM XT i386; 512Kb RAM; 5.25" FDD; 1.4Mb FDD; 5Mb HDD; VGA 256-colour graphics card; AdLib soundcard; DR DOS 6.0; Windows 3.0Comment
-
Glad to see I'm not the only one.Otto, your age is not an excuse for bad behavior.
Constantly bringing up issues which are already logged is simply rude. It is no different from the gimme pigs, who I shall remind you are usually treated with having their posts deleted outright......
You aren't working on the project, so cut the guys some slack. It's their time and effort, not yours.Last edited by mikephfl; 09-10-2013, 15:28.Mike
Proud Supporter of OR
Creator of YardMaster
"Thanks for using YardMaster"Comment
-
No, but I just did, and it seems to be working as desired. No suicidal cars today.
He was quoting me, so it should be obvious who Robert was talking to...
The problem was related to passing over/under another car on a bridge where the coupler was close to the centerline of the under/over track. The sim was sensing that it was within coupling range, and it would jump off the bridge and couple to the train in motion. Turns out that only the XZ params were being used to determine coupler distances, and not the Y. Easy mistake, easily solved.If you like what you see here at Trainsim.com, be it the discussions and knowledge in the forums, or items available in our library, I hope you'll consider a paid membership to help support keeping the site operating.... Thanks!Comment
-





Comment