cab shake question

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cbff33
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2003
    • 503

    #1

    cab shake question

    Spent the evening of july 4th in glendo wyoming watching some great bnsf action. I could really notice the bounce of the locos and frame flex and all that. I know orts models cab shake.....but would it be possible to model the cab bounce whenever it hits different gradient track...
  • apco25
    1500 Post Veteran
    • Jan 2008
    • 1827
    • Home is the Chicago suburbs

    #2
    It's a generic motion model to give you the impression of the normal movement you see. I would be great if eventually such motion would be induced by grade crossing, switches, diamonds and such. Maybe in the forthcoming releases.

    Btw, I set my mine to level 1 (any more and its too much of a roller coaster ride) to get the best effect.
    sigpicJust say NO to Fictional Railroad Foaming...

    Comment

    • cbff33
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2003
      • 503

      #3
      Ya I was at the grade crossing in glendo wyoming at a little truck stop....took a bunch of video with my phone. Lead end engines bounce not too noticable as they were still working up to speed....but by time the trailing 2 locos came over the grade crossing.....the up and down bounce was very evident. Driving an 18 wheeler I'm used to frame flex over bumps and such. But to really be able to see pronounced frame flex on 200 ton locos is always impressive. I think the spring bounce initiated by grade changes and crossings and such would be a neat addition to or if its possible.

      Comment

      • seagoon
        5000 Post Veteran

        • Jun 2001
        • 5161
        • Yamba, N.S.WALES, Australia

        #4
        Originally posted by apco25
        It's a generic motion model .....
        Too regular, too cyclic and not random or erratic.
        IMO Railworks does a good job of simulating cab movement, as does Run 8.

        Bruce
        IBM XT i386; 512Kb RAM; 5.25" FDD; 1.4Mb FDD; 5Mb HDD; VGA 256-colour graphics card; AdLib soundcard; DR DOS 6.0; Windows 3.0

        Comment

        • cbff33
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2003
          • 503

          #5
          Who asked about either of those sims? As the op of this post I will say railworks is a bore. And run 8 carries no interest for me.

          Comment

          • seagoon
            5000 Post Veteran

            • Jun 2001
            • 5161
            • Yamba, N.S.WALES, Australia

            #6
            Originally posted by cbff33
            Who asked about either of those sims? As the op of this post I will say railworks is a bore. And run 8 carries no interest for me.
            Nobody asked.
            As a responder to your post I simply observed that the replication of "cab shake", to which you originally referred, is more realistically presented in two other current simulations whereas in OR the effect is more like standing on the rolling deck of a small ship.

            Whether or not you like or dislike either of those simulations is immaterial. It was a comparison. As is the use of the ship analogy. And nobody asked for that, either.

            Bruce
            IBM XT i386; 512Kb RAM; 5.25" FDD; 1.4Mb FDD; 5Mb HDD; VGA 256-colour graphics card; AdLib soundcard; DR DOS 6.0; Windows 3.0

            Comment

            • cbff33
              Senior Member
              • Apr 2003
              • 503

              #7
              And my question was purely in relation to future development of cab shake within or ....not about which sim does a better job of producing cabshake at this point in time.

              Comment

              Working...