BVE 4 versus BVE 2 (performance issues again)

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • leezer3
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2003
    • 221
    • UK

    #46
    RE: BVE 4 versus BVE 2 (performance issues again)

    BVE 4
    Have you seen my post above though- My AGP port is over 4x faster than the one on your mobo.

    Cheers

    Chris Lees

    Comment

    • Boxcars
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2005
      • 283
      • Cambridge, United Kingdom.

      #47
      RE: BVE 4 versus BVE 2 (performance issues again)

      >BVE 4
      >Have you seen my post above though- My AGP port is over 4x
      >faster than the one on your mobo.
      >
      >Cheers
      >
      >Chris Lees

      Oh yeh ! Sorry x( !!

      Comment

      • lankylancaster
        Member
        • Aug 2004
        • 37
        • .

        #48
        RE: BVE 4 versus BVE 2 (performance issues again)

        OK, well I suppose I'll just wait until I get my laptop for uni and make sure i get decent hardware! Thanks again to everyone who has advised me on this. I'll have to cope with 10fps for the time being, and god knows how low they'll go on WJ-Rugby!

        Comment

        • leezer3
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2003
          • 221
          • UK

          #49
          RE: BVE 4 versus BVE 2 (performance issues again)

          I know- It sucks
          From where you are now, my probable solution would be to buy a new mobo, case & gfx card and re-use the rest of the stuff from your current system, as the components in your system appear to have been cheap & nasty. It all depends to what extent you are prepared to build your own PC/ spend money.

          Cheers

          Chris Lees

          Comment

          • hongjian
            Senior Member
            • Apr 2003
            • 293
            • York, N.Yorkshire, UK.

            #50
            RE: BVE 4 versus BVE 2 (performance issues again)

            8X and 2X AGP video card definately make a big difference to graphics performance especially on a Celeron CPU. A good video card will compensate the limitations of Celeron CPU in graphics intensive software.

            However, this does not outperform a Pentium 4 PC of similiar frequency and similiar video hardware installed. As I had tried BVE on Celeron, AMD and Pentium 4 PC, I could conclude that Pentium 4 outperforms AMD or Celeron.

            Comment

            • Rohan
              Member
              • May 2005
              • 38
              • .

              #51
              RE: BVE 4 versus BVE 2 (performance issues again)

              Personally I've never noticed a significant performance difference between Celeron and P4, especially with the new Celeron D's, even in games.

              However, an AGP 2x slot is definitely going to be a lot, lot slower than an AGP 8x slot. The easiest way to fix that is to change your motherboard (a new one will cost about £40-£100 depending on the brand and quality). It is a difficult upgrade to do, but there is no reason to change anything else, saving the money of buying a new PC.

              Comment

              • Boxcars
                Senior Member
                • Jan 2005
                • 283
                • Cambridge, United Kingdom.

                #52
                RE: BVE 4 versus BVE 2 (performance issues again)

                >OK, well I suppose I'll just wait until I get my laptop for
                >uni and make sure i get decent hardware! Thanks again to
                >everyone who has advised me on this. I'll have to cope with
                >10fps for the time being, and god knows how low they'll go on
                >WJ-Rugby!

                Hey Lanky,

                Don't forget that Anthony, on his projects page, has implied that WJ-Rugby has a planned compatibility with BVE v2.6 and v4.2 so you won't have to cope with such low fps as 10.

                Comment

                Working...