BVE: All my apologies.

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ferrovipathe
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2003
    • 169
    • Paris, France.

    #1

    BVE: All my apologies.

    I made a stupid mistake in "BVE Utilities", the last sheet of "Loop making of".

    Formulaes for computing switches' offset were wrong, and I didn't saw it. x(

    That's as more silly as all computes and formulaes are rights everywhere else, except in last page. :-(

    Computing an offset (a length...) with an angle (or PI) is so stupid....it's like computing speed with pounds...


    So, you can find these corrected sheets here:

    http://ferrovipathe.free.fr/Docs/For...pour%20BVE.pdf in French

    and

    http://ferrovipathe.free.fr/Docs/BVE%20UTILITIES.pdf in English.

    Full corrected versions are still available on my site,





    Just a request: If someone find an other error, don't understand something or just want to smooth my english, please send me a mail, it always will be a pleasure for me to progress.

    All the best.

  • mfonda
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2004
    • 231
    • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

    #2
    RE: All my apologies.

    I have corrected my copy of your article. In calculating the curve angle of 50 m switches you based your argument on 3.8m separation. Mine are 4m appart and according to your formula the angle should be 1.1453 (arc= 625.333). In practice I find that 1.123 looks better. Why should that be? Martin

    Comment

    • ferrovipathe
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2003
      • 169
      • Paris, France.

      #3
      RE: All my apologies.

      Hi Martin !

      I know nothing about your track map nor your source code.

      But it's possible to compute some little things:

      With 4 m separation, and 50 m length switches, we got:

      Deviation = 4 / 2 = 2 m;
      Radius = 50 * 50 / (2*2) = 625 m.
      =>
      - Direct:
      - Angle = (180*37.5)/( PI * 625 ) = 3.437746771
      - Offset = 25*25/(2*625) = 0.5 m

      - Reverse:
      - Angle = 1.4591559 (as 37.5/12.5 = 3, angle = 3.437746771 / 3)
      - Offset = 0.5 m

      You find that 1.123 look better. So yor switch is reversed and your effective radius is:
      (180 * 12.5) / ( PI * 1.123) = 637.7535565 m

      and separation between tracks = 2 * ( 50*50/(2*637.7535565) ) = 1.96 * 2 = 3.92 m.

      I think there is a mistake somewhere, perhaps creating object with switch15: Use 625 m radius and 2 m offset:
      Example : creating a lefthand switch:
      lenght 50
      offset right = 0
      offset left = -2
      ....

      and put it as freeobj(X,Y,.5,0,3.437) if you want to turn left on switch

      or freeobj(X,Y,-.5,0,181.4591559) if you are coming from right on that switch reversed .

      All the best.

      Comment

      • mfonda
        Senior Member
        • Jul 2004
        • 231
        • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

        #4
        RE: All my apologies.

        Thanks again, Jean-Louis. It is very clear now. I had arrived at the .5m offset not mathematically, but purely by eye; upon using your calculation I found that this was right. The angle seems to change a little owing to some obscure circumstance. The main thing is that it is possible to come to a ball-park figure that can than be 'queeked' to look good. I also had the occasion to look at your website again where I found a great deal of interesting work done by Italian BVE-ers. Very nice. Best wishes. Martin

        Comment

        Working...