BVE: Screenshots & BETA information

[Christpher125]

Hi Nathan

At RSJ, you need some clutter next to and beyond the platform on the right where the coal yard is, and where the old engine shed was. Also the line is in a valley, and on the right slightly higher up you need some houses. But other than that, it's looking good.
(Also, you've forgotten that RSJ now has a footbridge at the far end of the platform before the signalbox.

Chris

[NathanWhitington]

RE: Screenshots & BETA information

>Hi Nathan
>
>At RSJ, you need some clutter next to and beyond the
>platform on the right where the coal yard is, and where the
>old engine shed was. Also the line is in a valley, and on
>the right slightly higher up you need some houses. But other
>than that, it's looking good.
>(Also, you've forgotten that RSJ now has a footbridge at the
>far end of the platform before the signalbox.
>
>Chris

Forgive me I've been usign an early video, and there doesn't appear to be a footbridge in the video, which is probably why I've forgotten it. I'm not sure when I will set this, so there may not be a Smallbrook Junction, and there may well be a signal box on the pier.

[NathanWhitington]

RE: Screenshots & BETA information

>Below is various images, side on, head on and with the the
>LT red & cream one.

So there are!

[paul_t]

RE: Screenshots & BETA information

Hello all,

I've used BVE for quite some time now, and have decided to register and talk to other people out there. Given that the Island line is under way, does anyone fancy coding the Fastcat from Portsmouth Harbour to the pierhead? We've got buses under way, so why not boats? Before anyone asks, I haven't yet attempted coding, but will get around to it just as soon as the railways are renationalised and Finsbury Park depot is rebuilt.

Best regards

Paul

[Christpher125]

RE: Screenshots & BETA information

Hi Nathan

The point is though that if you don't include modern changes and things like Smallbrook, then 1938 stock will be wrong for the route, and as yet no one has made any 'standard' stock yet.

Chris

[Stooopid_person]

RE: Screenshots & BETA information

>Hi Nathan,
>I like the NSE 1938. I hope the dinosaur livery will be
>included in final release.

So is that the 1938 stock that DownUnder Tom sent?

[NathanWhitington]

RE: Screenshots & BETA information

>Hi Nathan
>
>The point is though that if you don't include modern changes
>and things like Smallbrook, then 1938 stock will be wrong
>for the route, and as yet no one has made any 'standard'
>stock yet.
>
>Chris

OK point taken, I never said I wasn't including the footbridge in the route at all. Now I think you should stay out of the matter altogether as I find you downright rude and abbrupt.

EDIT: I've also not decided when I'll set the route (as I've already mentioned) And nowhere have I said that it is set in stone which train will use the routefile. Perhaps you might use a nicer way of suggesting improvements.

[NathanWhitington]

RE: Screenshots & BETA information

>>Hi Nathan,
>>I like the NSE 1938. I hope the dinosaur livery will be
>>included in final release.
>
>So is that the 1938 stock that DownUnder Tom sent?

Affraid not. I have started the dinosaur livery and I shall finish it

[Christpher125]

RE: Screenshots & BETA information

>>Hi Nathan
>>
>>The point is though that if you don't include modern changes
>>and things like Smallbrook, then 1938 stock will be wrong
>>for the route, and as yet no one has made any 'standard'
>>stock yet.
>>
>>Chris
>
>OK point taken, I never said I wasn't including the
>footbridge in the route at all. Now I think you should stay
>out of the matter altogether as I find you downright rude
>and abbrupt.
>
>EDIT: I've also not decided when I'll set the route (as I've
>already mentioned) And nowhere have I said that it is set in
>stone which train will use the routefile. Perhaps you might
>use a nicer way of suggesting improvements.

Sorry Nathan for you thinking I am abrupt, but where have I been rude? Perhaps a bit over-enthusiastic, but I am offended by being killed rude because I merely gave you -constructive- criticism. I live on the Island, and know the route, so I am sure that I can give you some helpful advice. However, please point out to me where I have been rude and I will apologise. Giving someone advice for the better good is surely not seen as being provocative or rude or am I seeing things wrong?

Chris

[Stooopid_person]

RE: Screenshots & BETA information

>The point is though that if you don't include modern changes
>and things like Smallbrook, then 1938 stock will be wrong
>for the route, and as yet no one has made any 'standard'
>stock yet.

Standard Stock has been made, if you look at the Piccadilly Line, there should be a Standard Stock, which was modified by me, from a mixture of the 1959 and Q stock.

I'm not sure whether it has been included in the newest V3, but V2 defintely has it. I can give you a screenshot if you want to.

Almost ALL LU stock objects has been made. A few exceptions are the Battery Locos. Tube Stock from Standard Stock all the way to 1996 stock except the 3 1986 stocks has been made by different authors with all of them including interiors except the 1996 stock, fround on RandLU route.
Surface Stock made are G, Q, CO/CP, R, A, C, D.

[NathanWhitington]

RE: Screenshots & BETA information

>>>Hi Nathan
>>>
>>>The point is though that if you don't include modern changes
>>>and things like Smallbrook, then 1938 stock will be wrong
>>>for the route, and as yet no one has made any 'standard'
>>>stock yet.
>>>
>>>Chris
>>
>>OK point taken, I never said I wasn't including the
>>footbridge in the route at all. Now I think you should stay
>>out of the matter altogether as I find you downright rude
>>and abbrupt.
>>
>>EDIT: I've also not decided when I'll set the route (as I've
>>already mentioned) And nowhere have I said that it is set in
>>stone which train will use the routefile. Perhaps you might
>>use a nicer way of suggesting improvements.
>
>Sorry Nathan for you thinking I am abrupt, but where have I
>been rude? Perhaps a bit over-enthusiastic, but I am
>offended by being killed rude because I merely gave you
>-constructive- criticism. I live on the Island, and know the
>route, so I am sure that I can give you some helpful advice.
>However, please point out to me where I have been rude and I
>will apologise. Giving someone advice for the better good is
>surely not seen as being provocative or rude or am I seeing
>things wrong?
>
>Chris

You could have put things in nicer ways, instead of "you need" and using the attitude whereby you see yourself as somewhat superior to myself because you reside on the IOW.

[NathanWhitington]

RE: Screenshots & BETA information

>>The point is though that if you don't include modern changes
>>and things like Smallbrook, then 1938 stock will be wrong
>>for the route, and as yet no one has made any 'standard'
>>stock yet.
>
>Standard Stock has been made, if you look at the Piccadilly
>Line, there should be a Standard Stock, which was modified
>by me, from a mixture of the 1959 and Q stock.
>
>I'm not sure whether it has been included in the newest V3,
>but V2 defintely has it. I can give you a screenshot if you
>want to.
>

If you could show a screenie of the standard stock that would be wonderful Thanks.

[Christpher125]

RE: Screenshots & BETA information

Hi Nathan

I do not feel more 'superior' to you, I was merely stating that i live on the Island, and that obviously gives me a advantage (perhaps not much) when it comes to relating information as I would have been over the line a few days earlier. My use of 'you need' is perhaps that of a teacher looking through a piece of work and saying 'you need a full stop here', rather than that of a order, and I apologise if I think that I was being abrupt. I was merely trying to get information across as quick as I could because I have been feeling queasy lately and looking at a computer screen gives me a headache. I think this is all a big miss-understanding and I hope you are adult enough to let bygones be bygones and move on from this unfortunate episode.

Chris

[Christpher125]

RE: Screenshots & BETA information

Hi

That standard stock looks great - you can just imagine it in Inter-city livery! (note-for people that dont know, for a time Island stock ran in modified Intercity livery!)

Chris

[NathanWhitington]

RE: Screenshots & BETA information

>Hi
>
>That standard stock looks great - you can just imagine it in
>Inter-city livery! (note-for people that dont know, for a
>time Island stock ran in modified Intercity livery!)
>
>Chris

What time would this be?